Here is how these two trekking poles compare on the numbers. On the data the Distance Carbon Z is the stronger all-round pick, and the question is whether the FT3 still fits your budget or priorities.
| Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z | Gossamer Gear FT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 94✓ | 77 |
| Weight (pair) | 8.7 oz✓ | 12.4 oz |
| Packed length | 36 cm✓ | 38 cm |
| Max length | 120 cm | 130 cm✓ |
| Min length | 120 cm | 110 cm |
| Price | $170✓ | $245 |
| Material | Carbon | Carbon |
| Fold style | Fixed | Folding |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: Distance Carbon Z in blue, FT3 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Min length is shown for context and is not scored. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full trekking-pole comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z against the Gossamer Gear FT3 is a study in priorities. The Distance Carbon Z is the stronger pick on most of the specs that matter, while the FT3 makes its case on reach.
The Distance Carbon Z is 3.7 oz lighter per pair, a little shorter packed, and $75 cheaper. The FT3 is a longer reach (130 vs 120 cm). On the default GearScore the Distance Carbon Z leads 94 to 77.
Pick the Distance Carbon Z if you care most about low weight and packability, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the FT3 if reach matter more to you, or you are focused on your priorities.
The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z. It is 3.7 oz lighter per pair than the FT3.
The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z. It is a little shorter packed than the FT3.
The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z, 94 to 77 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
The Distance Carbon Z is the stronger all-round pick here. Choose the FT3 if reach is your priority.