Here is how these two backpacks compare on the numbers. The Ariel 65 takes a modest overall edge, led by low weight, but the Baltoro 65 has its own case.
| Osprey Ariel 65 | Gregory Baltoro 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 71✓ | 66 |
| Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |
| Weight | 4 lb 14 oz✓ | 4 lb 15 oz |
| Rated load | 60 lb | 60 lb |
| Fabric denier | 420 D✓ | 210 D |
| Price | $370 | $370✓ |
| Type | Backpacking | Backpacking |
| Frame | Internal | Internal |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: Ariel 65 in blue, Baltoro 65 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Capacity is shown for context and is not scored, since more volume is a sizing choice rather than better. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full backpack comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Osprey Ariel 65 against the Gregory Baltoro 65 is a study in priorities. The Ariel 65 wins on low weight and durability, and the Baltoro 65 pushes back on price.
The Ariel 65 is 1 oz lighter and tougher fabric (420D vs 210D). The Baltoro 65 is a little cheaper. On the default GearScore the Ariel 65 leads 71 to 66.
Pick the Ariel 65 if you care most about low weight and durability, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the Baltoro 65 if price matter more to you, or you are focused on getting the most for your money.
The Osprey Ariel 65. It is 1 oz lighter than the Baltoro 65.
The Osprey Ariel 65. It is tougher fabric (420D vs 210D) than the Baltoro 65.
The Osprey Ariel 65, 71 to 66 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the Ariel 65 for low weight, or the Baltoro 65 for price. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.