Here is how these two headlamps compare on the numbers. The UT27 Pro leans on low weight while the FL75R answers with brightness, so the pick comes down to which you value.
| Nitecore UT27 Pro | Coast FL75R | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 79✓ | 73 |
| Max lumens | 800 lm | 1000 lm✓ |
| Weight | 2.6 oz✓ | 3.7 oz |
| Beam distance | 183 m✓ | 168 m |
| Max runtime | n/s | 14 h |
| Price | $60 | $50✓ |
| Battery | Rechargeable | Hybrid |
| Water rating | IP66 | n/s |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: UT27 Pro in blue, FL75R in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Runtime is shown for context and is not scored, since makers publish it at different brightness levels. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full headlamp comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Nitecore UT27 Pro against the Coast FL75R is a study in priorities. The UT27 Pro wins on low weight and longer throw, and the FL75R pushes back on brightness and price.
The UT27 Pro is 30 g lighter and a longer beam (183 vs 168 m). The FL75R is brighter (1000 vs 800 lm) and $10 cheaper. On the default GearScore the UT27 Pro leads 79 to 73.
Pick the UT27 Pro if you care most about low weight and longer throw, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the FL75R if brightness and price matter more to you, or you are focused on your priorities.
The Nitecore UT27 Pro. It is 30 g lighter than the FL75R.
The Coast FL75R. It is brighter (1000 vs 800 lm) than the UT27 Pro.
The Nitecore UT27 Pro, 79 to 73 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the UT27 Pro for low weight, or the FL75R for brightness. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.