Here is how these two headlamps compare on the numbers. The NU27 takes a modest overall edge, led by brightness, but the Range 400 has its own case.
| Nitecore NU27 | BioLite Range 400 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 79✓ | 74 |
| Max lumens | 600 lm✓ | 400 lm |
| Weight | 2.0 oz✓ | 2.6 oz |
| Beam distance | 123 m✓ | 90 m |
| Max runtime | 57 h | 200 h |
| Price | $45✓ | $60 |
| Battery | Rechargeable | Rechargeable |
| Water rating | n/s | IP67 |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: NU27 in blue, Range 400 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Runtime is shown for context and is not scored, since makers publish it at different brightness levels. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full headlamp comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Nitecore NU27 against the BioLite Range 400 is a study in priorities. The NU27 wins on brightness and low weight, and the Range 400 pushes back on value.
The NU27 is brighter (600 vs 400 lm), 17 g lighter, and a longer beam (123 vs 90 m). On the default GearScore the NU27 leads 79 to 74.
Pick the NU27 if you care most about brightness and low weight, which makes it the better call for your priorities. Pick the Range 400 if you would rather save the difference.
The Nitecore NU27. It is brighter (600 vs 400 lm) than the Range 400.
The Nitecore NU27. It is 17 g lighter than the Range 400.
The Nitecore NU27, 79 to 74 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the NU27 for brightness, or the Range 400 for the price. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.