A close look at two tents buyers cross-shop. The Dagger OSMO 3P leans on low weight while the Hubba Hubba LT 3 answers with floor space, so the pick comes down to which you value.
| NEMO Dagger OSMO 3P | MSR Hubba Hubba LT 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 76✓ | 73 |
| Capacity | 3 | 3 |
| Packed weight | 61.0 oz✓ | 70.0 oz |
| Floor area | 42.8 sq ft | 47 sq ft✓ |
| Space-to-weight | 11.2 /lb✓ | 10.7 /lb |
| Peak height | 44 in✓ | 42 in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Vestibules | 2 | 2 |
| Price | $650 | $650 |
| Type | Backpacking | Backpacking |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: Dagger OSMO 3P in blue, Hubba Hubba LT 3 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full tent comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
Put the NEMO Dagger OSMO 3P next to the MSR Hubba Hubba LT 3 and the trade-offs are clear. The Dagger OSMO 3P wins on low weight and space-to-weight, and the Hubba Hubba LT 3 pushes back on floor space.
The Dagger OSMO 3P is 9 oz lighter, better space-to-weight, and taller (44 vs 42 in peak). The Hubba Hubba LT 3 is more floor area (47 vs 42.8 sq ft). On the default GearScore the Dagger OSMO 3P leads 76 to 73.
Pick the Dagger OSMO 3P if you care most about low weight and space-to-weight, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the Hubba Hubba LT 3 if floor space matter more to you, or you are focused on comfort and room to move.
The NEMO Dagger OSMO 3P. It is 9 oz lighter than the Hubba Hubba LT 3.
The MSR Hubba Hubba LT 3. It is more floor area (47 vs 42.8 sq ft) than the Dagger OSMO 3P.
The NEMO Dagger OSMO 3P, 76 to 73 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the Dagger OSMO 3P for low weight, or the Hubba Hubba LT 3 for floor space. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.