Two headlamps worth lining up side by side. The HM65R-T V2.0 leans on low weight while the Perun 2 answers with brightness, so the pick comes down to which you value.
| Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 | Olight Perun 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 67✓ | 62 |
| Max lumens | 1600 lm | 2500 lm✓ |
| Weight | 5.0 oz✓ | 5.7 oz |
| Beam distance | 185 m✓ | 166 m |
| Max runtime | n/s | 300 h |
| Price | $105 | $81✓ |
| Battery | Rechargeable | Rechargeable |
| Water rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: HM65R-T V2.0 in blue, Perun 2 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Runtime is shown for context and is not scored, since makers publish it at different brightness levels. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full headlamp comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 and Olight Perun 2 take different routes to the same job. The HM65R-T V2.0 wins on low weight and longer throw, and the Perun 2 pushes back on brightness and price.
The HM65R-T V2.0 is 18 g lighter and a longer beam (185 vs 166 m). The Perun 2 is brighter (2500 vs 1600 lm) and $24 cheaper. On the default GearScore the HM65R-T V2.0 leads 67 to 62.
Pick the HM65R-T V2.0 if you care most about low weight and longer throw, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the Perun 2 if brightness and price matter more to you, or you are focused on your priorities.
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0. It is 18 g lighter than the Perun 2.
The Olight Perun 2. It is brighter (2500 vs 1600 lm) than the HM65R-T V2.0.
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0, 67 to 62 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the HM65R-T V2.0 for low weight, or the Perun 2 for brightness. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.