Here is how these two headlamps compare on the numbers. The HM60R V2.0 leans on low weight while the HF8R Core answers with brightness, so the pick comes down to which you value.
| Fenix HM60R V2.0 | Ledlenser HF8R Core | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 60✓ | 58 |
| Max lumens | 1300 lm | 1600 lm✓ |
| Weight | 5.5 oz✓ | 6.8 oz |
| Beam distance | 120 m | 210 m✓ |
| Max runtime | 300 h | 90 h |
| Price | $85✓ | $120 |
| Battery | Hybrid | Rechargeable |
| Water rating | IP68 | IP68 |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: HM60R V2.0 in blue, HF8R Core in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Runtime is shown for context and is not scored, since makers publish it at different brightness levels. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full headlamp comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Fenix HM60R V2.0 against the Ledlenser HF8R Core is a study in priorities. The HM60R V2.0 wins on low weight and price, and the HF8R Core pushes back on brightness and longer throw.
The HM60R V2.0 is 37 g lighter and $35 cheaper. The HF8R Core is brighter (1600 vs 1300 lm) and a longer beam (210 vs 120 m). On the default GearScore the HM60R V2.0 leads 60 to 58.
Pick the HM60R V2.0 if you care most about low weight and price, which makes it the better call for counting grams on long miles. Pick the HF8R Core if brightness and longer throw matter more to you, or you are focused on your priorities.
The Fenix HM60R V2.0. It is 37 g lighter than the HF8R Core.
The Ledlenser HF8R Core. It is brighter (1600 vs 1300 lm) than the HM60R V2.0.
The Fenix HM60R V2.0, 60 to 58 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the HM60R V2.0 for low weight, or the HF8R Core for brightness. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.