Two headlamps worth lining up side by side. The HM50R V2.0 takes a modest overall edge, led by brightness, but the Vizz has its own case.
| Fenix HM50R V2.0 | Princeton Tec Vizz | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 75✓ | 71 |
| Max lumens | 700 lm✓ | 550 lm |
| Weight | 2.8 oz✓ | 3.2 oz |
| Beam distance | 115 m✓ | 85 m |
| Max runtime | 42 h | 135 h |
| Price | $60 | $52✓ |
| Battery | Hybrid | AAA |
| Water rating | IP68 | IPX7 |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: HM50R V2.0 in blue, Vizz in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Runtime is shown for context and is not scored, since makers publish it at different brightness levels. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full headlamp comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Fenix HM50R V2.0 and Princeton Tec Vizz take different routes to the same job. The HM50R V2.0 wins on brightness and low weight, and the Vizz pushes back on price.
The HM50R V2.0 is brighter (700 vs 550 lm), 13 g lighter, and a longer beam (115 vs 85 m). The Vizz is $8 cheaper. On the default GearScore the HM50R V2.0 leads 75 to 71.
Pick the HM50R V2.0 if you care most about brightness and low weight, which makes it the better call for your priorities. Pick the Vizz if price matter more to you, or you are focused on getting the most for your money.
The Fenix HM50R V2.0. It is brighter (700 vs 550 lm) than the Vizz.
The Fenix HM50R V2.0. It is 13 g lighter than the Vizz.
The Fenix HM50R V2.0, 75 to 71 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the HM50R V2.0 for brightness, or the Vizz for price. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.