Two backpacks worth lining up side by side. Both are solid; the right one depends on the specs you care about most.
| Osprey Rook 65 | REI Co-op Trailmade 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| GearScore | 66✓ | 63 |
| Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
| Weight | 3 lb 11 oz | 3 lb 5 oz✓ |
| Rated load | n/s | 35 lb |
| Fabric denier | 600 D✓ | 100 D |
| Price | $205 | $189✓ |
| Type | Backpacking | Backpacking |
| Frame | Internal | Internal |
Highlighted cells mark the better spec: Rook 65 in blue, Trailmade 60 in amber. A blank spec is never counted as a win. Capacity is shown for context and is not scored, since more volume is a sizing choice rather than better. GearScore is the overall rating (0 to 100); re-weight it on the full backpack comparison. Prices are current MSRP.
The Osprey Rook 65 and REI Co-op Trailmade 60 take different routes to the same job. The Rook 65 wins on durability, and the Trailmade 60 pushes back on low weight and price.
The Rook 65 is tougher fabric (600D vs 100D). The Trailmade 60 is 6 oz lighter and $16 cheaper. On the default GearScore the Rook 65 leads 66 to 63.
Pick the Rook 65 if you care most about durability, which makes it the better call for rough ground and hard use. Pick the Trailmade 60 if low weight and price matter more to you, or you are focused on counting grams on long miles.
The REI Co-op Trailmade 60. It is 6 oz lighter than the Rook 65.
The Osprey Rook 65. It is tougher fabric (600D vs 100D) than the Trailmade 60.
The Osprey Rook 65, 66 to 63 on the default algorithm. You can re-weight the factors to match your trip.
It depends on your priorities. Go with the Rook 65 for durability, or the Trailmade 60 for low weight. The spec table above shows exactly where each wins.